www.danielscranton.com
Will Humans be Getting on E.T. Ships & Going into Space? ∞St. Germain, Channeled by Daniel Scranton, October 28, 2025
www.danielscranton.com
Will Humans be Getting on E.T. Ships & Going into Space? ∞St. Germain, Channeled by Daniel Scranton, October 28, 2025
www.danielscranton.com
Is 3I Atlas a Replay of Atlantis? ∞The Creators, Channeled by Daniel Scranton, October 27, 2025
www.danielscranton.com
Summoning You Beyond the 5th Dimension/4th Density ∞Thymus, Channeled by Daniel Scranton, October 23, 2025
www.danielscranton.com
Summoning You Beyond the 5th Dimension/4th Density ∞Thymus, Channeled by Daniel Scranton, October 23, 2025
www.danielscranton.com
Everyone Needs to Receive this Message ∞The 9D Arcturian Council, Channeled by Daniel Scranton, October 21, 2025
@6:03
@23:32
@27:37
@28:32
Someone in the comments:
@a__f
I also work in this area, and this talk has some mistakes that I feel were pretty important.
I don't think the speaker understands NIST's justification for allowing AES-128/SHA-256. NIST justifies allowing AES-128 in the report that the graphic at 38:09 is taken from. There are two reasons why Grover's algorithm cannot crack modern symmetric crypto.
1) Grover's algorithm does not parallelize well at all. Cracking AES-128 with Grover's would require 2^64 iterations, but they would largely be *serial*. When the EFF cracked DES, they were running iterations on many processors (about 1800) in parallel, but they likely would not have been able to do this if they had to do all 2^56 operations on one processor.
2) Evaluating AES/SHA-256/other modern crypto on a quantum computer is really inefficient. NIST links the state of the art papers in this area, and they require tons of qubits and tons of resources. According to recent NIST estimates, running Grover's algorithm for AES-128 would require 2^108 gates in a serial computation (yes it's only 2^64 iterations, but those iterations are really expensive). This is not feasible.
Another commenter:
@sourkrause9354
I wouldn't classify myself as a "quantum denier", but its important to realize that even if Quantum attacks on cryptography are possible by 2030, its not going to be a commodity threat nor is it going to be something 90% of organizations will even be targeted with at first. That will take at least another 5 years after the "breakthrough" simply because of how expensive and non-generic these computers are. They're just not going to be widely available to 99.99% of threat actors.
Also you stated "CISOs don't want to deal with this because their lifespan at the org is 2 years". That's not why. They don't care about this yet because they have far more fundamental issues. They're still dealing with systems that have vulnerabilities 10+ years old, shadow IT, poor governance, users clicking phishing links, and so much more. We have much more fundamental things to worry about. Quantum is edgy and cool, but it doesn't do you any good if the threat actor can get into an unpatched firewall and pivot to the web server and steal all your passwords that some dumb developer decided to hash without salting using MD5.
@nicholasbridge829
What's the largest number we've factored so far?
@a__f
The largest number we have factored so far is 21. There are some results that claim to factor much larger numbers, but they all have asterisks and don't scale up for various reasons. For instance, you can make Shor's algorithm run much faster if you already know the factorization of the number, which is obviously a bad assumption. Some of them use "adiabatic quantum computing", which most likely doesn't scale to very large numbers either.
www.danielscranton.com
Simple Teachings for Your Complicated Lives ∞Thymus: The Collective of Ascended Masters, Channeled by Daniel Scranton, October 9, 2025
www.danielscranton.com
Give This a Shot…What Do You Have to Lose? ∞The Creators, Channeled by Daniel Scranton, October 8, 2025
www.danielscranton.com
This Message is More Important than You Think ∞The Creators, Channeled by Daniel Scranton, October 7, 2025
www.danielscranton.com
The October 2025 Energies & Closing Out 2025 ∞The 9D Arcturian Council, Channeled by Daniel Scranton, October 6, 2025
TRIGGER WARNING
This video talks about people's alien abduction experiences. Many of the experiencers have memories of genetic material being taken from them.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11188206/
Hi,
I just finished watching a documentary about public shaming in our modern culture. It was a very interesting watch, and Monica Lewinsky helped direct it.
It explores the human psychology behind public shaming and cancel culture. It also discusses how major tech companies like Twitter exploit our attention—using clickbait and emotionally charged content (negativity, anger, politics)—to increase profits.
"The more that people look at it and click on it, the more those companies make. (Facebook, Google, YouTube, Twitter, Amazon, etc.)"
"I [online person] say why I'm angry; I'm contributing more content. You didn't have to pay me for that. So I'm a useful idiot in a scam to create more attention for everyone else. You run that algorithm (Twitter) for three to ten years, and you let society run through that washing machine. That dystopia is exactly the world that we live in now. We're more profitable if we're addicted, outraged, irritable, disinformed, and polarized than if we are human beings."
—Tristan Harris, Technology Ethicist
This marketing and business strategy has run rampant, with virtually no repercussions in the U.S. It has led to further division on both political sides, as well as a widespread increase in hateful content. Hate groups like Neo-Nazis and other far-right organizations have been able to spread their racist ideologies online.
"White Robes and Broken Badges: Infiltrating the KKK and Exposing the Evil Among Us" by Joe Moore is an excellent book I strongly recommend. It sheds light on how deeply racism still exists in America today.
Additionally, some individuals have become almost immune to shame, using online anonymity to spread toxicity—often in purposeful, negative, and destructive ways.
Anyway, it was a very thought-provoking documentary, and I highly recommend watching it.
Cheers
Rob Gauthier